METHODOLOGY: A total of 102 FFPE cervical tissues were collected from 2 tertiary hospitals and immunohistochemical reactivity staining of E6 and E7 oncoproteins of HPV16 and HPV18 were evaluated using immunoreactive scoring (IRS) system and analysed statistically.
RESULT: The result showed an increased oncoprotein expression with the progression of cervical lesions. There is a statistically significant association between histology grade and HPV16/18-E6 expression (p = 0.028). However, there are no significant association of histological grade to HPV16-E7 immunoreactivity score (p = 0.264) and HPV18-E7 (p=0.080).
CONCLUSION: The immunohistochemical expression of HPV oncoproteins is a potential alternative diagnostic tool applicable in a low-resource laboratory setting. The advantage of the histochemical evaluation is that this method is simpler to apply and less expensive in comparison to in situ mRNA hybridization. Nevertheless, our study also found that antibodies against HPV that are commercially available suffer quite substantial specificity issues such as background staining and inconsistency between different batches. Hence, the utilization of antibody-based staining warrants stringent quality control.
RESULTS: The calibration curve showed a linear range between 0.01 fM to 0.01 nM with a limit of detection 0.05 fM. The results showed that the optimum concentration for DNA probe was 5 µM. The good performance of the proposed biosensor was achieved through hybridization of DNA probe-modified SPCE with extracted DNA from clinical samples.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the investigated results, this biosensor can be introduced as a proprietary, accurate, sensitive, and rapid diagnostic method of HPV 18 in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of real samples.
METHODS: In the first part of the analysis costs attributable to cervical cancer and precancerous lesions were estimated; epidemiologic data were sourced from the WHO GLOBOCAN database and Malaysian national data sources. In the second part, a prevalence-based model was used to estimate the potential annual number of cases of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions that could be prevented and subsequent HPV-related treatment costs averted with the bivalent (HPV 16/18) and the quadrivalent (HPV 16/18/6/11) vaccines, at the population level, at steady state. A vaccine efficacy of 98% was assumed against HPV types included in both vaccines. Effectiveness against other oncogenic HPV types was based on the latest results from each vaccine's respective clinical trials.
RESULTS: In Malaysia there are an estimated 4,696 prevalent cases of cervical cancer annually and 1,372 prevalent cases of precancerous lesions, which are associated with a total direct cost of RM 39.2 million with a further RM 12.4 million in indirect costs owing to lost productivity. At steady state, vaccination with the bivalent vaccine was estimated to prevent 4,199 cervical cancer cases per year versus 3,804 cases for the quadrivalent vaccine. Vaccination with the quadrivalent vaccine was projected to prevent 1,721 cases of genital warts annually, whereas the annual number of cases remained unchanged with the bivalent vaccine. Furthermore, vaccination with the bivalent vaccine was estimated to avert RM 45.4 million in annual HPV-related treatment costs (direct+indirect) compared with RM 42.9 million for the quadrivalent vaccine.
CONCLUSION: This analysis showed that vaccination against HPV 16/18 can reduce the clinical and economic burden of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions in Malaysia. The greatest potential economic benefit was observed using the bivalent vaccine in preference to the quadrivalent vaccine.