MyMedR

Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext In-hospital Mortality Rates in SARS-CoV-2 Patients Treated with Enoxaparin and Heparin

Alroomi M, Alsaber A, Al-Bader B, Almutairi F, Malhas H, Pan J, et al.

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2022;28:10760296221131802.
PMID: 36285386 DOI: 10.1177/10760296221131802

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate in-hospital mortality rates in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) according to enoxaparin and heparin use.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 962 patients admitted to two hospitals in Kuwait with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Cumulative all-cause mortality rate was the primary outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 302 patients (males, 196 [64.9%]; mean age, 57.2 ± 14.6 years; mean body mass index, 29.8 ± 6.5 kg/m2) received anticoagulation therapy. Patients receiving anticoagulation treatment tended to have pneumonia (n = 275 [91.1%]) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 106 [35.1%]), and high D-dimer levels (median [interquartile range]: 608 [523;707] ng/mL). The mortality rate in this group was high (n = 63 [20.9%]). Multivariable logistic regression, the Cox proportional hazards, and Kaplan-Meier models revealed that the use of therapeutic anticoagulation agents affected the risk of all-cause cumulative mortality.
CONCLUSION: Age, hypertension, pneumonia, therapeutic anticoagulation, and methylprednisolone use were found to be strong predictors of in-hospital mortality. In elderly hypertensive COVID-19 patients on therapeutic anticoagulation were found to have 2.3 times higher risk of in-hospital mortality. All cause in-hospital mortality rate in the therapeutic anticoagulation group was up to 21%.

Matched MeSH terms: Enoxaparin/therapeutic use
An Evaluation of a Factor Xa-Based Clotting Time Test for Enoxaparin: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Ng DPJ, Duffull SB, Faed JM, Isbister GK, Gulati A

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2018 May;24(4):669-676.
PMID: 28731370 DOI: 10.1177/1076029617711802

A well-accepted test for monitoring anticoagulation by enoxaparin is not currently available. As inadequate dosing may result in thrombosis or bleeding, a clinical need exists for a suitable test. Previous in silico and in vitro studies have identified factor Xa as an appropriate activating agent, and the phospholipid Actin FS as a cofactor for a Xa clotting time (TenaCT) test. A proof-of-concept study was designed to (1) explore the reproducibility of the TenaCT test and (2) explore factors that could affect the performance of the test. In vitro clotting time tests were carried out using plasma from 20 healthy volunteers. The effect of enoxaparin was determined at concentrations of 0.25, 0.50, and 1.0 IU/mL. Clotting times for the volunteers were significantly prolonged with increasing enoxaparin concentrations. Clotting times were significantly shortened for frozen plasma samples. No significant differences in prolongation of clotting times were observed between male and female volunteers or between the 2 evaluated age groups. The clotting times were consistent between 2 separate occasions. The TenaCT test was able to distinguish between the subtherapeutic and therapeutic concentrations of enoxaparin. Plasma should not be frozen prior to performing the test, without defining a frozen plasma reference range. This study provided proof-of-concept for a Xa-based test that can detect enoxaparin dose effects, but additional studies are needed to further develop the test.

Matched MeSH terms: Enoxaparin/therapeutic use*
Fulltext Low-molecular-weight heparin and mortality in acutely ill medical patients

Kakkar AK, Cimminiello C, Goldhaber SZ, Parakh R, Wang C, Bergmann JF, et al.

N Engl J Med, 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2463-72.
PMID: 22204723 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111288

BACKGROUND: Although thromboprophylaxis reduces the incidence of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients, an associated reduction in the rate of death from any cause has not been shown.
METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to assess the effect of subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg daily) as compared with placebo--both administered for 10±4 days in patients who were wearing elastic stockings with graduated compression--on the rate of death from any cause among hospitalized, acutely ill medical patients at participating sites in China, India, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines, and Tunisia. Inclusion criteria were an age of at least 40 years and hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure, severe systemic infection with at least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism, or active cancer. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of death from any cause at 30 days after randomization. The primary safety outcome was the rate of major bleeding during and up to 48 hours after the treatment period.
RESULTS: A total of 8307 patients were randomly assigned to receive enoxaparin plus elastic stockings with graduated compression (4171 patients) or placebo plus elastic stockings with graduated compression (4136 patients) and were included in the intention-to-treat population. The rate of death from any cause at day 30 was 4.9% in the enoxaparin group as compared with 4.8% in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 1.2; P=0.83). The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% in the enoxaparin group and 0.3% in the placebo group (risk ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.7 to 3.1; P=0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of enoxaparin plus elastic stockings with graduated compression, as compared with elastic stockings with graduated compression alone, was not associated with a reduction in the rate of death from any cause among hospitalized, acutely ill medical patients. (Funded by Sanofi; LIFENOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00622648.).
Note: Malaysia is a study site: participating investigators: Yaw Chong Hwa (WT Ma), Najihah I, SH How, Abdul Razak AM, Law WC (ST Tie), Bharathan T, Monniaty M, Aris Chandran, Ngau Yen Yew, Aziah AM, Irene Wong, CK Chuah, Rosemi S, KK Sia, Jeyaindran S, CY Leong

Matched MeSH terms: Enoxaparin/therapeutic use*
A cost-utility analysis of dabigatran, enoxaparin, and usual care for venous thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee replacement surgery in Thailand

Kotirum S, Chongmelaxme B, Chaiyakunapruk N

J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2017 Feb;43(2):252-262.
PMID: 27704332 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1433-5

To analyze the cost-utility of oral dabigatran etexilate, enoxaparin sodium injection, and no intervention for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement (THR/TKR) surgery among Thai patients. A cost-utility analysis using a decision tree model was conducted using societal and healthcare payers' perspectives to simulate relevant costs and health outcomes covering a 3-month time horizon. Costs were adjusted to year 2014. The willingness-to-pay threshold of THB 160,000 (USD 4926) was used. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses using a Monte Carlo simulation were performed. Compared with no VTE prophylaxis, dabigatran and enoxaparin after THR and TKR surgery incurred higher costs and increased quality adjusted life years (QALYs). However, their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were high above the willingness to pay. Compared with enoxaparin, dabigatran for THR/TKR lowered VTE complications but increased bleeding cases; dabigatran was cost-saving by reducing the costs [by THB 3809.96 (USD 117.30) for THR] and producing more QALYs gained (by 0.00013 for THR). Dabigatran (vs. enoxaparin) had a 98 % likelihood of being cost effective. Dabigatran is cost-saving compared to enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after THR or TKR under the Thai context. However, both medications are not cost-effective compared to no thromboprophylaxis.

Matched MeSH terms: Enoxaparin/therapeutic use*
Fulltext A comparison of enoxaparin with unfractionated heparins in patients with coronary heart disease in an emergency department in rural South Indian tertiary care teaching hospital

Ahmad A, Patel I, Asani H, Jagadeesan M, Parimalakrishnan S, Selvamuthukumaran S

Indian J Pharmacol, 2015 Jan-Feb;47(1):90-4.
PMID: 25821318 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.150360

Antithrombotic therapy with heparin plus antiplatelets reduces the rate of ischemic events in patients with coronary heart disease. Low molecular weight heparin has a more predictable anticoagulant effect than standard unfractionated heparin, is easier to administer, does not require monitoring and is associated with less ADRs. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and cost outcomes of Enoxaparin with a standard unfractionated heparin in patients with coronary heart disease.

Matched MeSH terms: Enoxaparin/therapeutic use*