MyMedR

Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Antrochoanal polyps: clinical presentation and the role of powered endoscopic polypectomy

Gendeh BS, Long YT, Misiran K

Asian J Surg, 2004 Jan;27(1):22-5.
PMID: 14719510

Antrochoanal polyps are a rare clinical entity. In this review of patients treated between January 1996 and September 2002, there were 18 cases of antrochoanal polyps. The mean age of patients was 20 years. Nasal obstruction was the most common symptom (17 cases, 94%), followed by rhinorrhoea (44%), epistaxis (33%), postnasal drip (28%), and snoring (22%). Chronic sinus was the most common associated rhinological finding (50%). Various surgical approaches were used: endoscopic polypectomy and middle meatal antrostomy in seven patients (38.9%), endoscopic polypectomy and inferior meatal antrostomy in three patients (16.7%) and Caldwell-Luc surgery in one patient (5.6%). No complications were noted in patients treated with powered instrumentation, including the three patients in whom combined transcanine approaches were used. We concluded that powered endoscopic polypectomy was safe and effective. It allowed a more complete dissection and may diminish the chance of recurrence.

Matched MeSH terms: Nasal Polyps/surgery*
Fulltext Intermittent respiratory obstruction secondary to an antro chonal polyp: a rare late presentation

Shashinder S, Kuljit S, Suhba ST, Arumainathan UD, Gopala KG

Med J Malaysia, 2007 Mar;62(1):72-3.
PMID: 17682578

We describe a child who presented with intermittent respiratory obstruction especially in supine position. Examination revealed a fleshy post nasal mass extending up to the oropharynx. The mass was removed surgically and histopathology revealed an antrochonal polyp. Patient was relieved of his symptoms and has been well ever since.

Matched MeSH terms: Nasal Polyps/surgery
Antrochoanal polyp--a rare paediatric emergency

Sharma HS, Daud AR

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 1997 Jul 18;41(1):65-70.
PMID: 9279638

An antrochoanal polyp, a common clinical entity, with a rare presentation is being reported. A 12 year old boy was brought to Accident and Emergency department with an unusual sudden presentation of polypoidal mass filling the oral cavity up to his incisors as a result of which he could not swallow and speak. Prior to this episode he had no complaints of the disease. An emergency removal was planned and only during the operation could it be diagnosed as a antrochoanal polyp because of its pedicle in the lateral wall of the nose, which was confirmed by histopathological examination.

Matched MeSH terms: Nasal Polyps/surgery*
Quality of life and recurrence of disease in patients with eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic 1 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

Khairuddin NK, Salina H, Gendeh BS, Wan Hamizan AK, Lund VJ

Med J Malaysia, 2018 Feb;73(1):1-6.
PMID: 29531195

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of life (QoL) and recurrence of disease in patients with eosinophilic (ECRSwNP) and non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (non-ECRSwNP) post endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).
METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional comparative study was carried out in the Otorhinolaryngology - HNS Department, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC). Subjective assessments of nasal symptoms and quality of life (QoL) using SNOT-22 and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and objective endoscopic assessment was undertaken using a modified Hadley endoscopic examination.
RESULTS: There was no significant statistical difference in the quality of life between the ECRSwNP and non-ECRSwNP groups as evidenced by the SNOT-22 score and the VAS comparison (p>0.05). However, there was a significant difference in terms of recurrence of disease with the presence of nasal polyps on endoscopic examination. (p = 0.016) CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found that there is no significant difference in QoL between ECRSwNP and non- ECRSwNP. There is higher frequency of recurrence of nasal polyps amongst ECRSwNP.

Matched MeSH terms: Nasal Polyps/surgery
Pilot study comparing steroid-impregnated and non-steroid-impregnated absorbable nasal dressing following endoscopic sinus surgery

Sow YL, Tang IP, Kho JPY, Prepageran N

Med J Malaysia, 2018 08;73(4):244-248.
PMID: 30121688

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is the mainstay for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis versus maximal medical therapy. We propose a more economical option, by using steroid-impregnated Gelfoam instead of Nasopore post ESS, as it is less expensive and has showed effectiveness in preventing post-operative bleeding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in eight patients with chronic rhinosinusitis or nasal polyposis who were planned for bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery. A Peri-operative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) Score and Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score (LKES) were recorded. The use of hydrocortisone-impregnated Gelfoam dressing versus normal saline-impregnated Gelfoam dressing were compared. Scores were repeated post-operatively at one week, three weeks and three months interval.
RESULTS: For LKES, at the end of three months, 50% of the patients had the same score difference, 37.5% had better results on the study side while 12.5% had better results on the control side. Meanwhile, for POSE Score, at the end of three months, 75% of the patients had better score difference on the study side while 12.5% had better results on the control side.
CONCLUSION: Gelfoam can be used as nasal packing material to deliver topical steroid after endoscopic sinus surgery. Steroid-impregnated nasal dressing after endoscopic sinus surgery may not provide better long-term outcome.

Matched MeSH terms: Nasal Polyps/surgery*