OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to assess the incremental value of V/Q SPECT/CT over conventional V/Q planar scintigraphy and V/Q SPECT, and to determine if Q only-SPECT/CT without the conventional ventilation component could replace the current imaging protocol in diagnosing pulmonary embolism.

METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 73 patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism who had undergone/Q planar scintigraphy, V/Q SPECT and V/Q SPECT/CT consecutively. Combination of clinical follow-up, laboratory test results and correlative imaging were used as reference standard. Q-only SPECT/CT datasets were then analysed separately without the V-planar, V-SPECT and V-SPECT/CT datasets.

RESULTS: A total of 66 patients fulfilled our initial inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 23 patients as positive for PE and 43 patients ruled out of having PE based on the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity for V/P planar scintigraphy, V/Q SPECT, and V/Q SPECT-CT were 86.9% and 39.5%, 91.3% and 55.8%, and 100% and 97.6% respectively. Overall, SPECT/CT resulted in significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than planar and SPECT imaging respectively (p<0.05). Q-only SPECT/CT significantly over diagnosed pulmonary embolism in 12 patients (p<0.05).