Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Ho TK, Razi MN, Tarib NA
    Undersea Hyperb Med, 2021 12 1;48(4):391-397.
    PMID: 34847302
    Background: Changes in barometric pressure conditions that occur during flying and diving under hyperbaric oxygen conditions were found to influence the retention of dental restorations.

    Aim: This experimental laboratory study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of glass fiber posts after being cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem, 3M ESPE) and self-etch adhesive resin cement (RelyX™ Ultimate, 3M ESPE) under normal atmospheric pressure and hyperbaric pressure cycles that simulate diving conditions.

    Methods: A total of 40 extracted, single-rooted mandibular premolars were treated endodontically and randomly divided into two groups according to the cements used for fiber post cementation. Each group was further randomly divided into two equal subgroups that were subjected to normal atmospheric pressure conditions and a simulated hyperbaric condition in a hyperbaric chamber. The pull-out bond strength of fiber posts was tested using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoc test (p<0.05).

    Results: At normal atmospheric pressure the mean value of the pull-out bond strength of RelyX Ultimate cement was significantly higher than that of RelyX Unicem cement. At hyperbaric pressure condition no significant difference was found between the mean values of the pull-out bond strength of RelyX Ultimate and RelyX Unicem cement.

    Conclusion: Hyperbaric pressure cycles demonstrated improved pull-out bond strength of glass fiber posts in RelyX Unicem cement but did not have significant effect on pull-out bond strength in RelyX Ultimate cement. Both resin cements have similar pull-out bond strength of glass fibers post after simulated dives.

  2. Tarib NA, Seong TW, Chuen KM, Kun MS, Ahmad M, Kamarudin KH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2012 Mar;20(1):35-9.
    PMID: 22474935
    This paper aims to evaluate the effect of splinting during implant impression. A master model with two fixtures at the sites of 45 and 47 was used. 20 impressions were made for all four techniques: (A) indirect; (B) direct, unsplinted; (C) direct, splinted; and (D) direct, splinted, sectioned, and re-splinted. Splinting was undertaken with autopolymerizing acrylic resin (AAR). Horizontal distance between fixtures was compared using a digital caliper. The difference in distance were analysed with one-way ANOVA. Group A showed a significantly lowest accuracy among all techniques (p < or = 0.05). There was no significant difference of accuracy among the groups using direct techniques (p > or = 0.05). Group D was more accurate compared to group B and C. We conclude that splinting of impression copings would be beneficial to obtain an accurate impression.
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links