Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Krishnasamy ST
    Sci Eng Ethics, 2008 Jun;14(2):291-3.
    PMID: 17882535
    The object of this communication is to reflect on the recent article by James Stieb in relation to an earlier article by Selvan.
  2. Lim TO, Selvan T, Suppiah A, Khan N, Ismail F
    Singapore Med J, 1992 Jun;33(3):287-9.
    PMID: 1631590
    The usefulness and validity of blood glucose measurement as an index of diabetic control were assessed with reference to serum fructosamine. Two hundred and twenty-eight non-insulin dependent diabetic out-patients were studied in the usual clinical setting. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) concentration was positively correlated with serum fructosamine (r = 0.42, t = 6.78 p less than 0.01). On the basis of their serum fructosamine concentrations, patients were divided into 3 groups. They were good control (fructosamine less than or equal to 288 umol/l), acceptable control (fructosamine less than or equal to 320 umol/l) and poor control groups (fructosamine greater than 320 umol/l). The mean fasting blood glucose concentration was significantly higher in the latter than the former 2 groups. However, at each level of control, there was a wide range of FBG concentrations. Thus, the value of FBG in predicting glycaemic control is limited. Its positive predictive value was only 32%, and its overall accuracy as an index of diabetic control was only 58% though its negative predictive value was high (93%). In 162 patients with poor diabetic control as indicated by their serum fructosamine concentrations, 81 (50%) of them had FBG less than 10 mmol/l on their clinic visit day. Fasting blood glucose is therefore not a reliable measure of good diabetic control, though it is useful in predicting poor control. FBG is simple to measure, cheap and rapidly available on clinic day, thus ensuring its continuing use. Doctors should be aware of its limitations and should not rely solely on FBG to assess diabetic control.
    Study site: Diabetic clinic, Hospital Mentakab, Pahang, Malaysia
  3. Lim TO, Suppiah A, Ismail F, Selvan T, Khan NKI, Ngah BA
    Singapore Med J, 1992 Apr;33(2):174-6.
    PMID: 1621123
    A study was undertaken to determine the extent of morbidity associated with asthma and to audit the management of asthma in two out-patient clinics of two district hospitals. Patients were recruited for the study during a 3-month period from December 1990 to February 1991. Seventy asthmatic patients were studied. Eighty-six percent of the patients had their sleep disturbed by asthma, 77% took daily medication regularly, 63% felt that their activities were restricted by asthma, 60% had at least one acute exacerbation in the preceding six months. Of those who had their peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measured, 40% had a PEFR below 50% predicted, and only 11% had normal PEFR (greater than 80% predicted). The morbidity of asthma was thus considerable. On the other hand, the drug treatment of these asthmatics was grossly inadequate. They were prescribed on average 2.1 item of drugs, which for most patients comprised an oral beta agonist and a theophylline. Only 43% of the patients received inhaler therapy, but no patients were given steroids, inhaled or oral. The drug treatment was unrelated to the severity of patients' asthma. Further, objective measurement of severity was under-used in the assessment of asthma, only 8.5% of patients ever had their PEFR recorded. This study has found that asthma is poorly managed in out-patient clinics. We need to improve the training of doctors in the optimal management of asthma.
    Study site: General outpatient clinics, district hospitals, Pahang, Malaysia
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links