MyMedR

Displaying all 3 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext Ischemic Stroke in a Young Patient with Nephrotic Syndrome and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Neoh KK, Tang ASN, Looi I, Anita BM

Case Rep Nephrol, 2020;2020:8828864.
PMID: 33294240 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8828864

We report a case of a 21-year-old man with underlying nephrotic syndrome (NS) secondary to minimal change disease, who developed an ischemic stroke with left hemiparesis. He received intravenous thrombolysis followed by a mechanical thrombectomy. After mechanical thrombectomy, he developed acute kidney injury which subsequently required haemodialysis. Further workup revealed that he had concomitant antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and NS. He was started on vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant. This case report illustrates the importance of workup in identifying causes of ischemic stroke in a young patient.
Clinical outcomes of acute stroke thrombolysis in neurologist and non-neurologist centres - A comparative study in Malaysia

Chew SH, Looi I, Neoh KK, Ooi J, Cheah WK, Zariah AA

Med J Malaysia, 2021 Jan;76(1):12-16.
PMID: 33510102

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase is a well-established treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). However, in Malaysia, treatment prescription is often limited by the availability of neurologists. The objective was to compare the outcomes of acute stroke thrombolysis therapy prescribed by neurologists in the Seberang Jaya Hospital (SJH) and non-neurologists in the Taiping Hospital (TH).
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, all AIS patients who received thrombolytic therapy in SJH and TH between January 2012 and September 2019 were included. Clinical data was extracted from admission records. The outcomes assessed were the percentage of patients who achieved excellent functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin scale of 0 to 1), rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH), and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 63 AIS patients who received thrombolytic therapy were included, of which 37 patients (58.7%) were treated in SJH. The median NIHSS on admission was 12 in SJH and 11.5 in TH. In all 21.6% of patients from SJH and 30.7% of patients from TH achieved favourable functional outcome at 3 months (p=0.412). There were no significant differences between the two centres in terms of the rates of SICH (10.8% in SJH and 3.8% in TH, p=0.314) and 3-month mortality (24.3% versus 12.5%, p=0.203).
CONCLUSION: The 3-month functional outcomes and complication rates of stroke thrombolysis in hospitals with or without neurologists are not significantly different. Thus non-neurologist hospitals may be able to provide thrombolysis service to AIS patients safely and effectively.
Fulltext Stroke Patients' Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes: A Pre-Post COVID-19 Comparison Study

Loh HC, Neoh KK, Tang ASN, Chin CJ, Suppiah PD, Looi I, et al.

Medicina (Kaunas), 2021 May 19;57(5).
PMID: 34069433 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57050507

Background and Objectives: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused significant disruption to established medical care systems globally. Thus, this study was aimed to compare the admission and outcome variables such as number of patient and its severity, acute recanalisation therapy given pre-post COVID-19 at a primary stroke centre located in Malaysia. Methods: This cross-sectional hospital-based study included adult ischaemic stroke patients. Variables of the study included the number of ischaemic stroke patients, the proportions of recanalisation therapies, stroke severity during admission based on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, functional outcome at discharge based on the modified Rankin Scale, and relevant workflow metrics. We compared the outcome between two six-month periods, namely the pre-COVID-19 period (March 2019 to September 2019) and the COVID-19 period (March 2020 to September 2020). Results: There were 131 and 156 patients, respectively, from the pre-COVID-19 period and the COVID-19 period. The median door-to-scan time and the median door-to-reperfusion time were both significantly shorter in the COVID-19 period (24.5 min versus 12.0 min, p = 0.047) and (93.5 min versus 60.0 min, p = 0.015), respectively. There were also significantly more patients who received intravenous thrombolysis (7.6% versus 17.3%, p = 0.015) and mechanical thrombectomy (0.8% versus 6.4%, p = 0.013) in the COVID-19 period, respectively. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic may not have caused disruptions of acute stroke care in our primary stroke centre. Our data indicated that the number of ischaemic stroke events remained stable, with a significant increase of recanalisation therapies and better in-hospital workflow metrics during the COVID-19 pandemic period. However, we would like to highlight that the burden of COVID-19 cases in the study area was very low. Therefore, the study may not have captured the true burden (and relevant delays in stroke patient management) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The effect of the pandemic crisis is ongoing and both pre-hospital and in-hospital care systems must continue to provide optimal, highly time-dependent stroke care services.

Filters

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links