METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed on MS, AQP4-Ab NMOSD, and MOGAD patients seen at the National Neuroscience Institute (NNI) Singapore. Individuals with psychiatrist-diagnosed psychiatric disorders before and after neurological diagnosis were identified. Demographic, clinical data, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 score at first clinic visit were collected and analysed.
RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-nine patients (249 MS, 102 AQP4-Ab NMOSD, 48 MOGAD) were included. A higher proportion of MS patients (13/249, 5.2%) had psychiatric disorders before neurological diagnosis, compared to AQP4-Ab NMOSD (1/102, 1.0%) and MOGAD (0/48, 0.0%) (p = 0.054). Within MS patients, univariate logistic regression revealed that age, sex, race, MS subtype, initial MRI lesion load, and interval between classical MS symptom onset to MS diagnosis were not associated with pre-existing psychiatric disorders. Mean PHQ-9 score for MS patients at their first MS consult was 4.4 (cut-off for no/minimal depression is ≤4); no clinical factors were predictive of higher PHQ-9 scores on univariate linear regression. The proportion of MS patients (29/236, 12.2%) who developed psychiatric illness after neurological diagnosis was not different from AQP4-Ab NMOSD (9/101, 8.9%) (p > 0.999), while this was significantly higher compared to MOGAD (0/48, 0.0%) (p = 0.021). The incidence rate of psychiatric diseases after neurological diagnosis, accounting for follow up time, was also similar between MS and AQP4-Ab NMOSD (incidence rate ratio 1.2; 95% confidence interval 0.54 - 2.8; p = 0.689).
CONCLUSION: There is a significant psychiatric burden prior to MS diagnosis compared to AQP4-Ab NMOSD and MOGAD. The increased frequency of psychiatric comorbidity after NMOSD diagnosis merits further study to investigate the determinants of this phenomenon.
METHODS: Nine AD experts from South and East Asia and one from Europe developed the algorithm based upon treatment guidelines, relevant literature and local treatment practices. The algorithm outlines current best practice for the use of emollients, topical corticosteroids (TCS) and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI), with the intention of simplifying the treatment regimen of mild-to-moderate AD in South and East Asia.
RESULTS: Patients with AD should bathe and cleanse affected skin to remove crusts and scales daily. Emollients should also be applied daily as a maintenance treatment. When selecting appropriate topical anti-inflammatory treatment for AD flares, several factors should be taken into consideration, including the patient's age, attitude to treatment options and site of AD lesions. Given the concerns regarding the risk of skin atrophy with use of TCS, a TCI should be used to treat AD lesions in sensitive skin areas: pimecrolimus is recommended for mild-to-moderate AD in these locations, while tacrolimus should be considered for moderate and severe cases. Either pimecrolimus or tacrolimus is recommended for flares in other, non-sensitive body locations. A proactive or intermittent maintenance treatment strategy involving regular emollient use and twice-weekly application of a TCI to previously affected areas is encouraged to reduce the risk of flares.
CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm proposed here is intended to simplify the topical treatment of mild-to-moderate AD in daily practice in South and East Asian countries.