MyMedR

Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

Fulltext Effect of single-session aerobic exercise with varying intensities on lipid peroxidation and muscle-damage markers in sedentary males

Moflehi D, Kok LY, Tengku-Kamalden TF, Amri S

Glob J Health Sci, 2012 Jul;4(4):48-54.
PMID: 22980341 DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n4p48

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the different intensity levels of single-session aerobic exercise on serum levels of lipid peroxidation and muscle damage markers in sedentary males.
Fulltext Incidental detection of sinus mucosal abnormalities on CT and MRI imaging of the head

Nazri M, Bux SI, Tengku-Kamalden TF, Ng KH, Sun Z

Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2013 Apr;3(2):82-8.
PMID: 23630655 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.03.06

To investigate the prevalence of incidental sinus abnormalities on CT and MRI imaging of the head, and identify if there is any correlation between patient symptomatology and image findings.
Fulltext Effects of blood flow restriction training on sports performance in athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Li R, Chee CS, Kamalden TF, Ramli AS, Yang K

J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2024 Jan;64(1):55-65.
PMID: 37902798 DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.23.15220-0

INTRODUCTION: Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is an effective training method to improve sports performance in healthy athletes. Nevertheless, a systematic review with meta-analysis regarding how BFRT affects sports performance in athletes is still lacking. Consequently, the study attempted to expand and consolidate the prior studies regarding the effect of BFRT on technical and physical performance in athletes.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This study was based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes) statement guidelines for a systematic review of the academic databases Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCOhost (SportDiscus), and Google Scholar. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included publications, which ranged from moderate to high quality. The systematic review protocol was registered on inplasy.com (INPLASY202380049).
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Out of 249 studies identified, 93 articles were evaluated as eligible, and after the screening, 18 studies were finally included in this systematic review. Meta-analysis results showed a significant enhancement on vertical jump height in the BFRT group compared to the control group (SMD=1.39, 95% CI=0.30-2.49, P=0.01). BFRT was able to significantly increase maximal oxygen uptake (SMD=1.65, 95% CI=0.56-2.74, P<0.01). While no significant improvement in sprint time was observed (SMD= -0.18, 95% CI=-1.18-0.82, P=0.115).
CONCLUSIONS: The finding suggests that BFRT is beneficial to athletes as this training method can be effective in enhancing physical and technical performance in athletes. Nevertheless, further analysis needs to be conducted to fully determine the effectiveness of the moderators of the intervention on sports performance.
Effects of blood flow restriction training on physical fitness among athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yang K, Chee CS, Abdul Kahar J, Tengku Kamalden TF, Li R, Qian S

Sci Rep, 2024 Jul 18;14(1):16615.
PMID: 39025894 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67181-9

Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is an effective, scientific and safe training method, but its effect on the overall quality of athletes remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to clarify the effects of BFRT on the physical fitness among athletes. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and SCOUPS, the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess methodological quality, and RevMan 5.4 and STATA 15.0 software were used to analyze the data. A meta-analysis of 28 studies with a total sample size of 542 athletes aged 14-26 years and assessed as low risk for quality was performed. Our results revealed that the BFRT intervention had small to large improvements in the athletes' strength (ES = 0.74-1.03), power (ES = 0.46), speed (ES = 0.54), endurance (ES = 1.39-1.40), body composition (ES = 0.28-1.23), while there was no significant effect on body mass (p > 0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed that moderator variables (training duration, frequency, load, cuff pressure, and pressurization time) also had varying degrees of effect on athletes' physical fitness parameters. In conclusion, BFRT had a positive effect on the physical fitness parameters of the athletes, with significantly improved strength, power, speed, endurance and body composition, but not body mass parameters. When the training frequency ≥ 3 times/week, cuff pressure ≥ 160 mmHg, and pressurization time ≥ 10 min, the BFRT group was more favorable for the improvement of physical fitness parameters.