MyMedR

Displaying all 5 publications

Abstract:

Sort:

SARS-CoV-2 and Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS): Insights from ASIA Perspectives

Hiew FL, Hung SKY

Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 2021 05 11;24(3):311-312.
PMID: 34446989 DOI: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_133_21
Clinical and functional change in multifocal motor neuropathy treated with IVIg

Chia PK, Hung SKY, Hiew FL

J Clin Neurosci, 2019 Nov;69:114-119.
PMID: 31416736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.016

We determined the clinical progression, disability and outcome of 11 Multifocal Motor Neuropathy (MMN) patients from Malaysia. Mean patient age was 46.8 (SD 13.3), with mean disease duration of 108.0 months (SD 80.2). All reported unilateral limb weakness at onset. At diagnosis, after mean 49.9 months (SD 73.5) delay, 7 (63.6%) had more than 2 limbs involvement. Nine (90%) of 10 patients received induction IVIg dose of 2.0 gm/kg responded, demonstrated improvement in MRCSS of > 2 points or mRS score of > 1 point. We observed 38.5% drop in IVIg dose to mean 1.12 gm/kg/month after 12 months of treatment, and a further 34.8% drop upon 24th month treatment to mean dose of 0.73 gm/kg/month. This was in parallel with initial improvement in MRCSS and mRS, observed among 88.9% and 77.8% of the patients, and later further improvement (33.3%) or stabilization (66.7%) of mRS score toward 2nd year. During the same period, 50% of patients reported deterioration in ONLS, 33.3% in grip strength and 16.7% in MMN-RODS. Beyond 36th month, average annual IVIg dose increased at 0.12 gm/kg/year (SD 0.09) or 11.2%, up to the 84th months. Despite that, progressive deterioration was observed in term of number of limbs involvement, definite motor conduction blocks on electrophysiology study, and both clinical as well as functional scores. Although IVIg dose reduction for maintenance treatment in MMN is recommended, careful clinical assessment is required to prevent under-treatment. Use of reliable and responsive modern outcome measures is important to quantify clinically relevant change to guide therapy.
Conventional and unconventional therapies in typical and atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with different clinical course of progression

Hung SKY, Hiew FL, Viswanathan S, Puvanarajah S

J Peripher Nerv Syst, 2018 Sep;23(3):183-189.
PMID: 30027593 DOI: 10.1111/jns.12282

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), corticosteroids and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are evidence-based conventional treatments for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). In many centres, unconventional treatments are frequently used as alternatives. We evaluated the outcome of conventional and unconventional therapies in 31 CIDP patients. Overall response rate with conventional first-line immunotherapies was 77% (20/26), comparable between IVIG and corticosteroids (80% vs 70%). Use of TPE was limited. Treatment response among typical and atypical CIDP were comparable (76 vs 80%). Non-responders were patients with progressive form of typical CIDP and DADS. Majority (21/26, 81%) of patients with persistent neurological deficits received maintenance therapy. Two subgroups of patients frequently treated with maintenance immunosuppressants were those with improving or stable disease following first-line treatment (12, 57%) and those with progressive form of CIDP (2, 10%). Primary indications for immunosuppressant use were corticosteroids-sparing and additional immunosuppression effects. Nine (64%) patients with improving or stable disease given azathioprine were taken off corticosteroids after a median duration of 14 months (range 12-108). Two (14%) eventually achieved cure or clinical remission without treatment. Maintenance IVIg was given to 6 (29%) relapsing CIDP patients; none of achieved cure or remission after similar median duration of treatment. Less potent immunosuppressant drugs (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate) were frequently used, with moderate adverse effect profiles. In resource limited setting, unconventional treatments were commonly used among CIDP patients with different clinical course of progression. In most cases, careful risk-benefit re-assessment is required to justify its further use.
Fulltext Risk Assessment Tool in Predicting the Therapeutic Outcomes of Antiseizure Medication in Adults with Epilepsy

Rusli RA, Makmor Bakry M, Mohamed Shah N, Loo XL, Hung SKY

Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2024;20:529-541.
PMID: 39220771 DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S467975

AIM: Identifying a patient's risk for poor outcomes after starting antiseizure medication (ASM) therapy is crucial in managing epilepsy pharmacologically. To date, there is a lack of designated tools to assess such risks.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a risk assessment tool for the therapeutic outcomes of ASM therapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in a hospital-based specialist clinic from September 2022 to August 2023. Data was analyzed from patients' medical records and face-to-face assessments. The seizure control domain was determined from the patients' medical records while seizure severity (SS) and adverse effects (AE) of ASM were assessed using the Seizure Severity Questionnaire and the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile respectively. The developed tool was devised from prediction models using logistic and linear regressions. Concurrent validity and interrater reliability methods were employed for validity assessments.
RESULTS: A total of 397 patients were included in the analysis. For seizure control, the identified predictors include ≥10 years' epilepsy duration (OR:1.87,95% CI:1.10-3.17), generalized onset (OR:7.42,95% CI:2.95-18.66), focal onset seizure (OR:8.24,95% CI:2.98-22.77), non-adherence (OR:3.55,95% CI:1.52-8.27) and having ≥3 ASM (OR:3.29,95% CI:1.32-8.24). Younger age at epilepsy onset (≤40) (OR:3.29,95% CI:1.32-8.24) and neurological deficit (OR:3.55,95% CI:1.52-8.27) were significant predictors for SS. For AE, the positive predictors were age >35 (OR:0.12,95% CI:0.03-0.20), <13 years epilepsy duration (OR:2.89,95% CI:0.50-5.29) and changes in ASM regimen (OR:2.93,95% CI: 0.24-5.62). The seizure control domain showed a good discriminatory ability with a c-index of 0.711. From the Bonferroni (ANOVA) analysis, only SS predicted scores generated a linear plot against the mean of the actual scores. The AE domain was omitted from the final tool because it did not meet the requirements for validity assessment.
CONCLUSION: This newly developed tool (RAS-TO) is a promising tool that could help healthcare providers in determining optimal treatment strategies for adults with epilepsy.
Second regional plasmapheresis conference and workshop for Southeast Asia (SEA) on the immunomodulatory role of plasma exchange in central and peripheral nervous system disorders, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 9th December 2017

Viswanathan S, Hung SKY, Goyal V, Apiwattanakul M, Thirugnanam UN, Abdullah S, et al.

J Clin Apher, 2018 Oct;33(5):559-568.
PMID: 29626354 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21630

In December 2017, 79 delegates attended the 2nd regional plasmapheresis conference and workshop for Southeast Asia (SEA) on the immunomodulatory role of plasma exchange in central and peripheral nervous system disorders in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. This meeting featured 6 plenary lectures, interactive sessions dedicated for experience sharing, case presentations, and a practical session for paramedics. Clinical experts and researchers from 7 SEA countries and India shared experience and challenges in treating autoimmune neurological disorders. While the spectrum of diseases and neurology practice remained largely similar, there was great disparities in accessibility of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) within SEA countries and between urban or rural settings. Costs, human resources, and healthcare policies are common challenges in providing sustainable TPE services. Novel techniques and innovative ideas in performing TPE were explored. A working consortium comprising of key opinion leaders was proposed to improve standards of TPE and enhance future research.