Examination of the original descriptions and available type specimens of nominal species previously regarded as synonyms of Thrissina mystax (Bloch and Schneider, 1801), and many non-type specimens representing an extensive geographic range, confirmed the validities of T. mystax, Thrissina porava (Bleeker, 1849), and Thrissina valenciennesi (Bleeker, 1866). Additionally, Engraulis poorawah Bleeker, 1872, a nominal species previously regarded as a junior synonym of T. mystax, is recognized as a junior synonym of Thrissina malabarica (Bloch, 1795). Diagnoses and detailed color descriptions are given for all of the valid species, in addition to clarification of their taxonomic histories, and neotype designation for T. porava. The phylogenetic relationships among 15 species of Thrissina (including T. porava and T. valenciennesi but not T. mystax) were reconstructed from the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene. T. porava and T. valenciennesi were not recovered as a monophyletic group, instead being divergent from each other and the other species of Thrissina by 12.4% and >11.7% mean uncorrected distances, respectively, confirming their reciprocal validity.
Examination of numerous specimens characterised by predorsal scute, long maxilla, indented preopercle and pelvic scute lacking a spine and previously identified as Stolephorusbengalensis (Dutt & Babu Rao, 1959) or Stolephorusinsularis Hardenberg, 1933, revealed four distinct species, true S.bengalensis (distributed from the Bay of Bengal to Pakistan) and three new species, viz., Stolephoruseldorado sp. nov. (Taiwan to Java, Indonesia), Stolephorusdiabolus sp. nov. (Strait of Malacca, from Penang , Malaysia, to Singapore) and Stolephoruseclipsis sp. nov. (Bintan Island, Riau Archipelago, Indonesia). Characters separating the four species include numbers of gill rakers on each gill arch and vertebrae and pelvic fin and dorsal-fin ray lengths. Two molecular markers (mitochondrial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase I genes) demonstrated the distinction of three of the species examined morphologically and enabled a reconstruction of their phylogenetic relationships. Each species was genetically divergent from the others by 3.5%-7.7% mean uncorrected distance in the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene.
The Bengal Spined Anchovy, Stolephorus taurus sp. nov. is described from 21 specimens from the northern Bay of Bengal. The new species closely resembles Stolephorus dubiosus Wongratana, 1983, which is redescribed. Both species have a predorsal scute, spine on the pelvic scute, long maxilla posteriorly slightly short of or just reaching the posterior margin of the opercle, 25 or more gill rakers on the lower limb of the first gill arch, and double black lines on the dorsum posterior to the dorsal fin. However, the new species differs from S. dubiosus in having a longer pelvic fin with the posterior tip of the depressed fin beyond vertical through the dorsal-fin origin (vs. usually not reaching to vertical through dorsal-fin origin), longer pectoral fin, second dorsal-and third dorsal-fin rays, second anal-and third anal-fin rays, and greater interorbital width. Stolephorus taurus sp. nov. is closely related to Stolephorus baganensis Delsman, 1931 and S. dubiosus, although at least 2% mean p-distance divergence in the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene separates each of the three species. A phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of the number of prepelvic scutes within Stolephorus indicated that having six scutes was the most likely ancestral condition in the genus, and was later reduced in the evolution of Stolephorus to five or four scutes. One such reduction occurred recently in the lineage of Stolephorus taurus sp. nov.