Majority of the traumatic spine injuries are located at the thoracolumbar region. They can be compression fractures, burst fractures, flexionextension injuries (Chance fractures), dislocations, or any of the combination. Surgery is indicated for patients with thoracolumbar injury classification scoring (TLICS) of 4 or more. Traditionally, surgical approaches for thoracolumbar spinal injuries involve open surgery, instrumentation with/without decompression. In our previous study, open surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar injuries and history of blood transfusion have been found to be associated with higher risk of deep surgical site infection requiring surgical debridement. With the advent of modern implants and equipments, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been made possible for spine surgeries. We report our two-year experience in utilizing MIS to treat traumatic thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Materials and method: Patients who underwent spinal surgeries at Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Kuantan from July 2017 to July 2019 were screened for suitability to be included in this study. Only patients who underwent spinal minimally invasive surgeries have been included in this study. Patients who underwent open spinal surgeries were excluded. Results: A total of 8 patients were included in this study. There were 3 burst fractures and 5 chance fractures. All patients underwent a minimum of 4-level posterior spinal instrumented fusion with MIS techniques and 2 patients had laminectomy at the injured level for decompression. All but one patient did not require blood transfusion and there was no incidence of surgical site infection among these patients. Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a better option compared to open surgery in treating traumatic thoracolumbar spinal injuries. By minimizing the surgical incision, we are able to reduce blood loss and avoid deep surgical site infection.
Solat or prayer, as one of the five pillars of Islam, and it is associated with bio-psycho-social benefits in Muslim patients. Â Many Muslim patients neglected solat while being hospitalized as they are unaware of the convenience (rukhsoh) available for them. Ibadah Friendly Hospital Courses have been conducted in different states of Malaysia to impart knowledge to the hospital staff who can in turn educate their patients. This study aims to construct a content-validated assessment tool and to assess the effectiveness of a state-level Hospital Mesra Ibadah course. Materials and methods: A self-administered questionnaire was constructed and content-validated by a panel of three experts (two religious teachers and one consultant spine surgeon). All 15 questions achieved item-level content validity index (I-CVI) of 1.00 after two rounds of validation. The questionnaires were distributed to participants of a state-level Hospital Mesra Ibadah course to compare the participants’ pre-course test score and post-course test score. Results: A total of 88 participants (48.9%) were included in this study. There was a significant difference in the pre-course test mean score and post-course test mean score among the participants. There was also a significant reduction of unsure answer after the course. There was no significant association found between the gender, place of working and occupations with the pre-post test score difference. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the Hospital Mesra Ibadah course is effective in imparting as well as consolidating the knowledge among participants, hence it should be routinely organized to benefit more participants.
Cervical spine injury is commonly associated with
road-traffic accidents. The true incidence of cervical
spine injuries is unknown due to under-reporting of
such injuries. Cervical spine injury is associated with
high morbidity and mortality if it is missed. With the
advancement of imaging modalities, the number of
missed cervical injuries has reduced. Nevertheless, some
clinicians are dependent solely on imaging tools to rule
out cervical spine injury in a trauma victim. We report
two cases of “near miss” C6 fracture to highlight the
importance of a detailed clinical history and clinical
examination with imaging as an adjunct to rule out
cervical injury.