Displaying all 6 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Kanis JA, Harvey NC, McCloskey E, Bruyère O, Veronese N, Lorentzon M, et al.
    Osteoporos Int, 2020 Apr;31(4):797-798.
    PMID: 32065251 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05297-0
    The article 'Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures',written by J. A. Kanis, was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume [#], issue [#] and page [#-#], the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication.
  2. Munns CF, Yoo HW, Jalaludin MY, Vasanwala R, Chandran M, Rhee Y, et al.
    JBMR Plus, 2023 Jun;7(6):e10744.
    PMID: 37283655 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10744
    X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited, multisystem disorder characterized by hypophosphatemia that occurs secondary to renal phosphate wasting. Mutations in PHEX gene (located at Xp22.1) in XLH alter bone mineral metabolism, resulting in diverse skeletal, dental, and other extraskeletal abnormalities that become evident in early childhood and persist into adolescence and adult life. XLH impacts physical function, mobility, and quality of life, and is associated with substantial socioeconomic burden and health care resource utilization. As the burden of illness varies with age, an appropriate transition of care from childhood and adolescence to adulthood is necessary to meet growth-related changes and minimize long-term sequelae of the condition. Previous XLH guidelines that encompassed transition of care have focused on Western experience. Regional differences in resource availability warrant tailoring of recommendations to the Asia-Pacific (APAC) context. Hence, a core expert panel of 15 pediatric and adult endocrinologists from nine countries/regions across APAC convened to formulate evidence-based recommendations for optimizing XLH care. A comprehensive literature search on PubMed using MeSH and free-text terms relevant to predetermined clinical questions on diagnosis, multidisciplinary management, and transition of care of XLH revealed 2171 abstracts. The abstracts were reviewed independently by two authors to shortlist a final of 164 articles. A total of 92 full-text articles were finally selected for data extraction and drafting the consensus statements. Sixteen guiding statements were developed based on review of evidence and real-world clinical experience. The GRADE criteria were used to appraise the quality of evidence supporting the statements. Subsequently, a Delphi technique was utilized to rate the agreement on statements; 38 XLH experts (15 core, 20 additional, 3 international) from 15 countries/regions (12 APAC, 3 EU) participated in the Delphi voting to further refine the statements. Statements 1-3 cover the screening and diagnosis of pediatric and adult XLH; we have defined the clinical, imaging, biochemical, and genetic criteria and raised red flags for the presumptive and confirmatory diagnosis of XLH. Statements 4-12 tackle elements of multidisciplinary management in XLH such as therapeutic goals and options, composition of the multidisciplinary team, follow-up assessments, required monitoring schedules, and the role of telemedicine. Treatment with active vitamin D, oral phosphate, and burosumab is discussed in terms of applicability to APAC settings. We also expound on multidisciplinary care for different age groups (children, adolescents, adults) and pregnant or lactating women. Statements 13-15 address facets of the transition from pediatric to adult care: targets and timelines, roles and responsibilities of stakeholders, and process flow. We explain the use of validated questionnaires, desirable characteristics of a transition care clinic, and important components of a transfer letter. Lastly, strategies to improve XLH education to the medical community are also elaborated in statement 16. Overall, optimized care for XLH patients requires prompt diagnosis, timely multidisciplinary care, and a seamless transfer of care through the coordinated effort of pediatric and adult health care providers, nurse practitioners, parents or caregivers, and patients. To achieve this end, we provide specific guidance for clinical practice in APAC settings. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
  3. Kanis JA, Harvey NC, McCloskey E, Bruyère O, Veronese N, Lorentzon M, et al.
    Osteoporos Int, 2020 Jan;31(1):1-12.
    PMID: 31720707 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05176-3
    Guidance is provided in an international setting on the assessment and specific treatment of postmenopausal women at low, high and very high risk of fragility fractures.

    INTRODUCTION: The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2019. This manuscript seeks to apply this in an international setting, taking additional account of further categorisation of increased risk of fracture, which may inform choice of therapeutic approach.

    METHODS: Clinical perspective and updated literature search.

    RESULTS: The following areas are reviewed: categorisation of fracture risk and general pharmacological management of osteoporosis.

    CONCLUSIONS: A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use to characterise fracture risk and direct interventions.

  4. Chandran M, Mitchell PJ, Amphansap T, Bhadada SK, Chadha M, Chan DC, et al.
    Osteoporos Int, 2021 Jul;32(7):1249-1275.
    PMID: 33502559 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05742-0
    Guidelines for doctors managing osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region vary widely. We compared 18 guidelines for similarities and differences in five key areas. We then used a structured consensus process to develop clinical standards of care for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and for improving the quality of care.

    PURPOSE: Minimum clinical standards for assessment and management of osteoporosis are needed in the Asia-Pacific (AP) region to inform clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and to improve osteoporosis care. We present the framework of these clinical standards and describe its development.

    METHODS: We conducted a structured comparative analysis of existing CPGs in the AP region using a "5IQ" model (identification, investigation, information, intervention, integration, and quality). One-hundred data elements were extracted from each guideline. We then employed a four-round Delphi consensus process to structure the framework, identify key components of guidance, and develop clinical care standards.

    RESULTS: Eighteen guidelines were included. The 5IQ analysis demonstrated marked heterogeneity, notably in guidance on risk factors, the use of biochemical markers, self-care information for patients, indications for osteoporosis treatment, use of fracture risk assessment tools, and protocols for monitoring treatment. There was minimal guidance on long-term management plans or on strategies and systems for clinical quality improvement. Twenty-nine APCO members participated in the Delphi process, resulting in consensus on 16 clinical standards, with levels of attainment defined for those on identification and investigation of fragility fractures, vertebral fracture assessment, and inclusion of quality metrics in guidelines.

    CONCLUSION: The 5IQ analysis confirmed previous anecdotal observations of marked heterogeneity of osteoporosis clinical guidelines in the AP region. The Framework provides practical, clear, and feasible recommendations for osteoporosis care and can be adapted for use in other such vastly diverse regions. Implementation of the standards is expected to significantly lessen the global burden of osteoporosis.

  5. Tai TW, Chen HY, Shih CA, Huang CF, McCloskey E, Lee JK, et al.
    Osteoporos Sarcopenia, 2024 Mar;10(1):3-10.
    PMID: 38690538 DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2024.02.001
    OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to present the Asia-Pacific consensus on long-term and sequential therapy for osteoporosis, offering evidence-based recommendations for the effective management of this chronic condition. The primary focus is on achieving optimal fracture prevention through a comprehensive, individualized approach.

    METHODS: A panel of experts convened to develop consensus statements by synthesizing the current literature and leveraging clinical expertise. The review encompassed long-term anti-osteoporosis medication goals, first-line treatments for individuals at very high fracture risk, and the strategic integration of anabolic and antiresorptive agents in sequential therapy approaches.

    RESULTS: The panelists reached a consensus on 12 statements. Key recommendations included advocating for anabolic agents as the first-line treatment for individuals at very high fracture risk and transitioning to antiresorptive agents following the completion of anabolic therapy. Anabolic therapy remains an option for individuals experiencing new fractures or persistent high fracture risk despite antiresorptive treatment. In cases of inadequate response, the consensus recommended considering a switch to more potent medications. The consensus also addressed the management of medication-related complications, proposing alternatives instead of discontinuation of treatment.

    CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides a comprehensive, cost-effective strategy for fracture prevention with an emphasis on shared decision-making and the incorporation of country-specific case management systems, such as fracture liaison services. It serves as a valuable guide for healthcare professionals in the Asia-Pacific region, contributing to the ongoing evolution of osteoporosis management.

Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links