According to the definition delivred by the WHO, a biomarker, independently from its role that may be indicative of exposure, response or effect, is inevitably linked to a clinical outcome or to a disease. The presence of a continuum from early biological events to therapy, and prognosis is the unifying mechanism that justifies this conclusion. Traditionally, the technical and inter-individual variability of the assays, together with the long duration between early pathogenetic events and the disease, prevented clinical applications to these biomarkers. These limitations became less important with the emerging of personalized preventive medicine because of the focus on disease prediction and prevention, and the recommended use of all data concerning measurable patient's features. Several papers have been published on the best validation procedures for translating biomarkers to real life. The history of cholesterol concentration is extensively discussed as a reliable example of a biomarker that - after a long and controversial validation process - is currently used in clinical practice. The frequency of micronucleated cells is a reliable biomarker for the pathogenesis of cancer and other non-communicable diseases, and the link with clinical outcomes is substantiated by epidemiological evidence and strong mechanistic basis. Available literature concerning the use of the micronucleus assay in clinical studies is discussed, and a suitable three-levels road-map driving this biomarker towards clinical practice is presented. Under the perspective of personalized medicine, the use of the micronucleus assays can play a decisive role in addressing preventive and therapeutic strategies of chronic diseases. In many cases the MN assay is either currently used in clinical practice or classified as adequate to consider translation into practice. The roadmap to clinical validation of the micronucleus assay finds inspiration from the history of biomarkers such as cholesterol, which clearly showed that the evidence from prospective studies or RCTs is critical to achieve the required level of trust from the healthcare profession. (307 words).
Micronucleus (MN) assay has been widely used as a biomarker of DNA damage, chromosomal instability, cancer risk and accelerated aging in many epidemiological studies. In this narrative review and meta-analysis we assessed the association between lymphocyte micronuclei (MNi) and cancers of the skin, blood, digestive tract, and prostate. The review identified nineteen studies with 717 disease subjects and 782 controls. Significant increases in MRi for MNi were observed in the following groups: subjects with blood cancer (MRi = 3.98; 95 % CI: 1.98-7.99; p = 0.000) and colorectal cancer (excluding IBD) (MRi = 2.69; 95 % CI: 1.82-3.98, p
The purpose of the "Micronuclei and Disease" special issue (SI) is to: (i) Determine the level of evidence for association of micronuclei (MN), a biomarker of numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations, with risk of specific diseases in humans; (ii) Define plausible mechanisms that explain association of MN with each disease; (iii) Identify knowledge gaps and research needed to translate MN assays into clinical practice. The "MN and Disease" SI includes 14 papers. The first is a review of mechanisms of MN formation and their consequences in humans. 11 papers are systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of the association of MN with reproduction, child health, inflammation, auto-immune disease, glycation, metabolic diseases, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, eleven common cancers, ageing and frailty. The penultimate paper focuses on effect of interventions on MN frequency in the elderly. A road map for translation of MN data into clinical practice is the topic of the final paper. The majority of reviewed studies were case-control studies in which the ratio of mean MN frequency in disease cases relative to controls, i.e. the mean ratio (MR), was calculated. The mean of these MR values, estimated by meta-analyses, for lymphocyte and buccal cell MN in non-cancer diseases were 2.3 and 3.6 respectively, and for cancers they were 1.7 and 2.6 respectively. The highest MR values were observed in studies of cancer cases in which MN were measured in the same tissue as the tumour (MR = 4.9-10.8). This special issue is an important milestone in the evidence supporting MN as a reliable genomic biomarker of developmental and degenerative disease risk. These advances, together with results from prospective cohort studies, are helping to identify diseases in which MN assays can be practically employed in the clinical setting to better identify high risk patients and to prioritise them for preventive therapy.