Displaying all 4 publications

Abstract:
Sort:
  1. Gan JT, Chandrasekaran SK, Tuan Jusoh TB
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2020 Sep;54(5):483-487.
    PMID: 33155556 DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19219
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and operative cost of a locked compression plate (LCP) and a nonlocked reconstruction plate in the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fracture.

    METHODS: From January 2013 till March 2018, a total of 55 patients with acute unilateral closed midshaft clavicle fracture were treated with either a 3.5-mm pre-contoured LCP [32 patients; 25 men and 7 women; mean age: 35 years (range: 19-63 years)] or a 3.5-mm nonlocked reconstruction plate [23 patients; 20 men and 3 women; mean age: 31.4 years (range: 17-61 years)]. The clinical outcomes in terms of fracture union, Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, implant irritation, failure rate, and reoperation rate were evaluated retrospectively. The patient billing records were reviewed to obtain primary operation, reoperation, and total operative cost for midshaft clavicle fracture. These values were analyzed and converted from Malaysia Ringgit (RM) to United States Dollar (USD) at the exchange rate of RM 1 to USD 0.24. All patients were followed up for at least one-year duration.

    RESULTS: The mean time to fracture union, implant irritation, implant failure, and reoperation rate showed no significant difference between the two groups of patients. The mean Quick DASH score was significantly better in the reconstruction plate group with 13 points compared with 28 points in the LCP group (p=0.003). In terms of total operative cost, the LCP group recorded a cost of USD 391 higher than the reconstruction plate group (p<0.001).

    CONCLUSION: The 3.5-mm reconstruction plate achieved not only satisfactory clinical outcomes but was also more cost-effective than the LCP in the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

    LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.

    Matched MeSH terms: Reoperation/methods
  2. Arslan H, Doğanay E, Karataş E, Ünlü MA, Ahmed HMA
    J Endod, 2017 Nov;43(11):1765-1769.
    PMID: 28967495 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.028
    INTRODUCTION: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a practical, nonpharmacologic technique for reducing pain. This study evaluated the effect of LLLT on postoperative pain after root canal retreatment (RCR).

    METHODS: This study enrolled patients (N = 36) who required root canal retreatment (RCR) on mandibular molar teeth, presented with periapical lesions with periapical index scores of 2 or 3, and had a pain visual analog scale (VAS) <50 and a percussion pain VAS <50. The participants were divided into 2 groups: (1) patients scheduled for RCR followed by LLLT (n = 18) and (2) patients scheduled for RCR followed by a mock LLLT (placebo) (n = 18). Postoperative pain was assessed using the VAS. Data were collected and statistically analyzed with the chi-square test, the independent sample t test, and the Mann-Whitney U test (P = .05).

    RESULTS: On the first 4 days, postoperative pain significantly reduced in the LLLT group compared with the placebo group (P  .05). The number of patients who needed analgesics was lower in the LLLT group than in the placebo group (P 

    Matched MeSH terms: Reoperation/methods
  3. Arif M, Sivananthan S, Choon DS
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2004 Jun;12(1):25-30.
    PMID: 15237118
    To report the outcome of revised total hip arthroplasty procedures involving an anterior cortical window, extensive strut allografts, and an Exeter impaction graft.
    Matched MeSH terms: Reoperation/methods
Related Terms
Filters
Contact Us

Please provide feedback to Administrator ([email protected])

External Links