An Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a tool of assessing the clinical school often used
in the education system of the healthcare system. Traditional Oral Examination (TOE) is also a clinical
examination where students are being tested by an examiner panel (1 or 2 members) on their clinical
activities and knowledge. It is designed to objectively test competence in skills such as history taking,
clinical examination, communication and clinical procedures. The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
of Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) also use OSCE for assessing clinical students. The aim of this study
was to compare the performance between the traditional oral examination (TOE) and OSCE among
undergraduate medical students. Study populations were the 3rd year MBBS students of the Faculty of
Medicine and Health Sciences of Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS). Number of students was 87. All
students underwent traditional oral examination after finishing a 2 months module. The same students
participated in the OSCE on the same day evening. Scores of each student were collected. Mean of the
scores were calculated. P value was measured by Student’s t test to evaluate the significant difference
between both the variables (traditional examination mean and OSCE mean) at 5% confidence interval (CI).
P-value was 0.00015 in 5% confidence level in two tailed hypotheses. As the value was less than 0.05 so
null hypothesis was rejected and alternate hypothesis was accepted. There was significant difference between the means of both the examinations. So it could be concluded that students’ performance was
significantly better in the OSCE over the traditional oral examination.
An Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is now a well-recognized modern type of
examination often used in faculties of medicine and health sciences all over the world. Though the
assessment tool has been designed to assess different types of clinical skill but this is evident that student
performance are not the same in different types of stations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the
performances in different types of OSCE stations among undergraduate medical students. Three types of
stations were set in this cross-sectional study. They were clinical reasoning, history taking and procedure
performing. On the examination day all the students had attended 3 stations for procedure, 4 stations for
clinical reasoning and 3 stations for history taking. The scores were collected and transferred to excel
spreadsheet. Mean score of each types of modules were calculated. Statistical difference between all three
means were measured by one-way ANOVA F-test. F was 7.2 and p-value was 0.001304. The result was
significant at p
Gurayat General Hospital is a 350 bed secondary referral hospital of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This is one of the busiest hospitals in Al-Jouf region. Trauma is very common in this city and the ER department is mostly overwhelmed by Neurosurgical emergency patients. The aim the study was to evaluate the age sex,
types of injuries and causes of injuries of the neurosurgical emergency patients. This was a cross-sectional descriptive observational study. Ethical approval was achieved from proper authority. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) ICH E6 protocol was followed in order to ensure safety and efficacy. Data was collected from the log book of the ER department. Data were transferred to a spreadsheet to make a master sheet. Valuables of individual columns were analyzed and tabulated. Comparison was performed between the result of this study and other international studies. About 7.3% of all ER admissions were for the Neurosurgical cases. Among the Neurosurgical cases (n=3588) there was clear predominance of male
gender (81%). Majority (45%) of the Neurosurgical patients were from children and teen age group. Nearly 50% of the patients reported to ER with the history of Road Traffic Accident (RTA). Head injury was the commonest (61%) type of injury. Approximately 45% patients were admitted in to general ward whereas 42% patients were discharged from ER after providing primary treatment. When the results of this study were compared to the results of the other international studies fair similarities were observed.
Dengue is one of the commonest viral diseases of Africa and tropical Asia. This disease is characterized by headache, fever, generalized body pain, severe malaise and back pain. The uncomplicated Dengue which is also named the classical dengue fever usually begins 3-8 days after biting of an infected mosquito. This is a cross sectional study on clinical presentation of Dengue in a general hospital in Bangladesh. The total number of patients was 198. The study period was 6 months (July 2004 to December 2004). All the patients who were admitted in the ‘Dengue ward’ and diagnosed as Dengue by serological test were included in this study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the common clinical presentations of Dengue in a General hospital in Bangladesh. The aim and objective was to compare the clinical presentations of Dengue in Bangladesh patients with those of other international studies. Most of the patients were male (3.7 :1) in sex and young adult(s) in age (80.3%). Fever and severe backache were the commonest clinical features. Nearly two-third (74%) patients presented with hemorrhagic features. Gum bleeding (20.2%) was the commonest bleeding feature. The result of this study showed a similarity with that of other international studies.