This systematic review was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) used in medical teaching for undergraduate medical students. The objectives are to (a) identify various teaching modalities which are used to enhance TEL; (b) evaluate whether TEL is more effective than traditional learning (TL) in cognitive and affective learning domain outcome. The empirical studies were searched in the following databases: Google Scholar, MEDLINE, ERIC, ProQuest, Cochrane Library and Scopus. All papers published from 2008 to 2018 were included. From eligible studies, the study design, study field, study population, intervention methods, type of assessment and learning achievement were abstracted and summarized the information. The search results were independently reviewed by two authors. From a pool of 1384 articles, 43 eligible articles were identified, enrolling 7292 undergraduate medical students examining comparative study between TEL and traditional learning. The results showed that there was a high degree of heterogeneity seen amongst the included studies in terms of TEL modalities used. The majority of intervention studies favoured online resources, while the rest used various offline multimedia electronic devices, virtual simulations and blended modes. Overall findings showed promising data that TEL is better than TL with regards to knowledge gain and skill acquisition, as well as providing higher student satisfaction. In all, the findings present blended learning in a positive and promising light in time, particularly where systematic reviews on technology-enhanced learning in the field of the undergraduate medical programme have produced mixed result.REVIEW ARTICLEA Systematic Literature Review on Technology-Enhanced Learning in Medical EducationMay Honey Ohn1*, Bareth Ravindran2, Chan Zhi Wei3, Khin Maung Ohn4, Ng Pey Luen5Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences 14 (1) January, 2020: 3 – 171 Emergency Department, Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom2 Surgical Department, Hospital Tuanku Ja’afar Seremban, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia3 Orthopaedics Department, Hospital Sungai Buloh, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia4 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia5 Radiology Department, Hospital Queen Elizabeth II, Sabah, Malaysia* Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] Received: 14 July 2019 Accepted: 5 November 2019Borneo Journal of Medical SciencesBJMSKeywords: blended learning, technology-enhanced learning, medical education, hybrid learning, undergraduate medical students