Affiliations 

  • 1 Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected]
  • 2 Département d'informatique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
  • 3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
  • 4 Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Australia
  • 5 Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  • 6 Faculty of Medicine, SPPH, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Khorram Ave, Isfahan, Iran
  • 7 Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Science and Technology, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Malaysia
Comput Biol Med, 2019 08;111:103346.
PMID: 31288140 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103346

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cardiovascular disease (CVD) and often leads to a heart attack. It annually causes millions of deaths and billions of dollars in financial losses worldwide. Angiography, which is invasive and risky, is the standard procedure for diagnosing CAD. Alternatively, machine learning (ML) techniques have been widely used in the literature as fast, affordable, and noninvasive approaches for CAD detection. The results that have been published on ML-based CAD diagnosis differ substantially in terms of the analyzed datasets, sample sizes, features, location of data collection, performance metrics, and applied ML techniques. Due to these fundamental differences, achievements in the literature cannot be generalized. This paper conducts a comprehensive and multifaceted review of all relevant studies that were published between 1992 and 2019 for ML-based CAD diagnosis. The impacts of various factors, such as dataset characteristics (geographical location, sample size, features, and the stenosis of each coronary artery) and applied ML techniques (feature selection, performance metrics, and method) are investigated in detail. Finally, the important challenges and shortcomings of ML-based CAD diagnosis are discussed.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.