Affiliations 

  • 1 Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia; School of Informatics and Applied Mathematics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia. Electronic address: [email protected]
  • 2 Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia; School of Informatics and Applied Mathematics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia. Electronic address: [email protected]
  • 3 Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia; School of Informatics and Applied Mathematics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia. Electronic address: [email protected]
Forensic Sci Int, 2017 Oct;279:41-52.
PMID: 28843097 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.07.034

Abstract

This paper presents a review on the state of the art in offline text-independent writer identification methods for three major languages, namely English, Chinese and Arabic, which were published in literatures from 2011 till 2016. For ease of discussions, we grouped the techniques into three categories: texture-, structure-, and allograph-based. Results are analysed, compared and tabulated along with datasets used for fair and just comparisons. It is observed that during that period, there are significant progresses achieved on English and Arabic; however, the growth on Chinese is rather slow and far from satisfactory in comparison to its wide usage. This is due to its complex writing structure. Meanwhile, issues on datasets used by previous studies are also highlighted because the size matter - accuracy of the writer identification deteriorates as database size increases.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.