Fulltext

Strategies and approaches to vector control in nine malaria-eliminating countries: a cross-case study analysis

Smith Gueye C 1 , Newby G 2 , Gosling RD 3 , Whittaker MA 4 , Chandramohan D 5 , Slutsker L 6 Show all authors , Tanner M 7

Affiliations 

  • 1 Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, USA. [email protected]
  • 2 Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, USA. [email protected]
  • 3 Malaria Elimination Initiative, Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, USA. [email protected]
  • 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, USA. [email protected]
  • 5 London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. [email protected]
  • 6 The University of Queensland School of Public Health, Herston, QLD, Australia. [email protected]
  • 7 Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. [email protected]
Malar J, 2016;15:2.
PMID: 26727923 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-1054-z

Abstract

There has been progress towards malaria elimination in the last decade. In response, WHO launched the Global Technical Strategy (GTS), in which vector surveillance and control play important roles. Country experiences in the Eliminating Malaria Case Study Series were reviewed to identify success factors on the road to elimination using a cross-case study analytic approach.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

MeSH terms
Similar publications