Affiliations 

  • 1 Department of Biology, CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
  • 2 Molecular Anthropology and Transfusion Medicine Research Laboratory, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, 10449, Taiwan
  • 3 IPATIMUP (Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto), Rua Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
  • 4 Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
  • 5 Centre for Global Health Research, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, Scotland, UK
  • 6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan
  • 7 Department of Biological Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK
  • 8 Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, 15 University Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
  • 9 Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
  • 10 Institute of Human Sciences, School of Anthropology, University of Oxford, The Pauling Centre, 58a Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6QS, UK
  • 11 Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. [email protected]
Hum Genet, 2016 Mar;135(3):309-26.
PMID: 26781090 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-015-1620-z

Abstract

There are two very different interpretations of the prehistory of Island Southeast Asia (ISEA), with genetic evidence invoked in support of both. The "out-of-Taiwan" model proposes a major Late Holocene expansion of Neolithic Austronesian speakers from Taiwan. An alternative, proposing that Late Glacial/postglacial sea-level rises triggered largely autochthonous dispersals, accounts for some otherwise enigmatic genetic patterns, but fails to explain the Austronesian language dispersal. Combining mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), Y-chromosome and genome-wide data, we performed the most comprehensive analysis of the region to date, obtaining highly consistent results across all three systems and allowing us to reconcile the models. We infer a primarily common ancestry for Taiwan/ISEA populations established before the Neolithic, but also detected clear signals of two minor Late Holocene migrations, probably representing Neolithic input from both Mainland Southeast Asia and South China, via Taiwan. This latter may therefore have mediated the Austronesian language dispersal, implying small-scale migration and language shift rather than large-scale expansion.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.