Affiliations 

  • 1 MBBS, DrFamMed, UM eHealth Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Email: [email protected]
  • 2 MBBChBAO, MFamMed, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Selangor, Malaysia
  • 3 MBBS, MFamMed, PhD, Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti, Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 4 BMedImag, PhD, Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti, Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
PMID: 37814667 DOI: 10.51866/cm0006

Abstract

ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) language model based on the GPT-3.5 architecture, is revolutionising scientific writing and medical research. Researchers employ ChatGPT for diverse tasks, including automated literature reviews, structured-outline generation and drafting/editing assistance. The tool adapts language for varied audiences, aids in citation management, supports collaborative writing and peer review and facilitates table/figure creation. While it enhances efficiency, concerns arise regarding ethics, bias, accuracy and originality. Transparent data sourcing and validation are crucial, as ChatGPT complements human efforts but does not replace critical thinking. Accordingly, researchers must uphold integrity, ensuring that AI-assisted content aligns with research principles. Acknowledgement of AI use in manuscripts, as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, ensures accountability. ChatGPT's transformative potential lies in harmonising its capabilities with researchers' expertise, fostering a symbiotic relationship that advances scientific progress and ethical standards.

* Title and MeSH Headings from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.